Execution Authorization

The authority layer for AI

AI systems can generate actions. TrigGuard determines whether those actions are allowed to become reality.

Open Console See the protocol

Core concept

Authority before execution

Not who can access the system, what is allowed to happen next.

Identity answers who can authenticate.
Policy answers what rules exist.
Execution Authorization answers what may happen next, before it happens.

The shift

Observe after vs control before

Traditional security detects compromise after execution. Execution Authorization controls whether irreversible actions proceed at all.

Traditional observability Observe after

Logs, SIEM, and audits tell you what already happened. Incident response starts after the damage.

Detects after execution
Post-hoc incident response
Evidence from log pipelines

Execution Authorization Control before

Every irreversible action passes through authorization. No receipt, no execution. Fail-closed by default.

Controls before execution
Real-time policy enforcement
Cryptographic proof per decision

Execution governance topology: proposals enter the Arbiter decision core and resolve to Permit, Deny, or non-routable Silence when authorization is absent.

Runtime governance topology

Permit, deny, and silence at the execution boundary

Every execution proposal passes through a deterministic decision core. Authorization must be explicit before runtime proceeds.

Permit - authorization confirmed; execution proceeds to runtime.
Deny - authorization refused; execution terminated before runtime.
Silence - authorization absent; execution is non-routable (fail-closed).

Architecture · Execution flow · Decision model

Protocol path

From intent to permitted execution

Every action follows a deterministic, cryptographically anchored path. Not a workflow, a protocol.

Action proposed
SDK intercepts the call before runtime executes.
Authority requested
Context sent to Gate with action identity and intent.
Policy evaluated
Arbiter checks against active policy bundles.
Decision issued
PERMIT, DENY, ESCALATE, or SILENCE, deterministic.
Receipt generated
Ed25519-signed proof bound to the decision.
Execution permitted
Action proceeds only with valid receipt signature.

Authority outcomes

Four outcomes. One gate.

People remember outcomes, not terminology. Every evaluation resolves to exactly one authority decision.

Permit Action authorized. Execution may proceed with signed receipt.
Deny Action blocked. SDK rejects with explicit reason and evidence.
Escalate Human approval required before execution can proceed.
Silence No authority issued. Passive logging only, execution remains blocked.

Category creation

Why this category exists

A new control plane for actions

Every era of infrastructure created a control plane for a new class of risk. Execution Authorization is the layer for autonomous action.

Firewalls control packets
Identity controls users
Execution Authorization controls actions

The next control plane

As AI systems become capable of deploying infrastructure, moving money, modifying data, and operating autonomously, authorization moves from users to actions.

Every AI company building agents that touch production will need an authority layer. This is not optional infrastructure, it is inevitable.

Verification

Cryptographic proof

Every authorized action generates a receipt, an Ed25519-signed attestation verifiable offline by any audit tool.

Signed receipt

{
 "receipt_id": "rcpt_7v2k...",
 "action": "db.write",
 "decision": "PERMIT",
 "issuer": "TrigGuard-Gate-01",
 "signature": "3a9c7b2e..."
}

Authorization is not a log line. Each decision produces cryptographically signed proof, audit-ready and independently verifiable against published keys.

Explore receipt schema

Category leadership

Execution Authorization is inevitable.

TrigGuard is building the infrastructure category that every AI company will need, authority before execution, with cryptographic proof.

Open Console View architecture Become design partner