Problem & risk
Teams invest in evals, red-teaming, and dashboards, yet agents still reach tools and APIs with insufficient runtime policy. The gap is architectural: you need a single enforcement point with deterministic semantics and cryptographic receipts.
Regulatory context
Regulators and customers increasingly ask not “which model?” but “what prevents harmful execution?”—evidence must tie controls to live systems.1
- See your sector pages for regime-specific mapping: banking, energy, industrial.
Solution
TrigGuard implements PERMIT, DENY, and SILENCE with policy-as-code, fail-closed defaults, and signed outcomes suitable for audit. It complements observability—it does not replace it.
- Authorization layer in front of tools and surfaces
- Consistent semantics across agents and services
- Integration with IAM, policy repos, and CI/CD
Integration points
Deploy adjacent to API gateways, service meshes, agent frameworks, and OT/industrial gateways—wherever irreversible actions originate.
Next steps
Choose how you want to engage—each action logs intent for follow-up when analytics is enabled.
Related reading & programme notes
- Latency, placement, and the execution gateway
- PERMIT · DENY · SILENCE decision model
- Execution authorization category overview
Long-form articles on the content calendar can deep-link here as they ship.